Skip to content
All posts

Most Missed Question in Internal Medicine Prep – Dieulafoy Lesion

When a patient has hematemesis but EGD shows blood with no ulcer or varices, think of an intermittently bleeding lesion like a Dieulafoy lesion that can be hard to visualize when not actively bleeding.

 

Question - Bleeding source

A 45-year-old man with a history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and long-standing alcohol use presents with sudden-onset nausea and vomiting of bright-red blood.

On physical examination, his pulse in 110 beats/minute and his blood pressure is 140/95 mm Hg. Laboratory studies reveal a glycated hemoglobin level of 8.9 g/dL, platelet count of 210,000/µL, and mean corpuscular volume of 92 fL. Upper endoscopy is performed and demonstrates a normal-appearing esophagus with no hiatal hernia. There is evidence of old blood in the stomach without any erosions, varices, or ulcers, and you note a normal-appearing duodenum.

What is the likely cause of this patient's bleeding?

Answer Options:  
A. esophageal varices  
B. portal gastropathy  
C. small intestinal angiodysplasia  
D. Cameron lesion  
E. Dieulafoy lesion

 

Dieulafoy lesions are an important board-relevant cause of significant, often sudden upper GI bleeding where endoscopy may show blood in the stomach without an obvious ulcer crater. They represent a large-caliber submucosal artery that erodes through a small mucosal defect, so the surrounding mucosa can appear normal—and the lesion can be missed if bleeding has stopped by the time of EGD.

Current major guidance on nonvariceal upper GI bleeding (e.g., ACG 2021; ESGE 2021) emphasizes that not all clinically important upper GI hemorrhage is ulcer-related. Dieulafoy lesions are a recognized nonvariceal source that may require repeat endoscopy, careful inspection (often proximal stomach/lesser curvature), and endoscopic therapy when identified.

 

Why This Question Is Often Missed

  • Test-takers over-anchor on alcohol use → varices, despite an explicitly normal esophagus and no varices on EGD.

  • Many expect “upper GI bleed” to equal peptic ulcer disease, but the stem removes ulcers/erosions.

  • Intermittent bleeds (Dieulafoy) are missed because learners assume “normal EGD” excludes a gastric source.

 

What the Distractors Indicate

Option What It Tests / Implies Why It’s Wrong Here
A. esophageal varices Portal HTN/advanced liver disease causing brisk hematemesis EGD shows **normal-appearing esophagus** and **no varices**. Platelets are normal (not supportive of portal HTN).
B. portal gastropathy Portal hypertension-related gastric mucosal oozing Endoscopy typically shows **mosaic/snake-skin** mucosa and friability/oozing; stem reports **no erosions/varices** and otherwise normal stomach aside from old blood.
C. small intestinal angiodysplasia “Obscure GI bleeding,” often occult/low-grade, sometimes melena Usually causes **occult bleeding/iron deficiency** or melena more than sudden large-volume hematemesis; also EGD localizes blood in stomach.
D. Cameron lesion Linear erosions/ulcers at diaphragmatic pinch in a hiatal hernia Stem explicitly says **no hiatal hernia**. Classic presentation is chronic blood loss/iron deficiency.
E. Dieulafoy lesion Intermittent arterial bleed with normal surrounding mucosa Fits: **old blood present** with no ulcer/varix; lesion may not be seen if not actively bleeding.

 

Internal Medicine High-Yield Pearl for Exam Prep

Hemateme­sis + EGD showing blood but no ulcer/varix → suspect an intermittent arterial lesion (Dieulafoy) and consider that it may be missed unless actively bleeding.

 

Core Learning Objectives

1. Differentiate major causes of upper GI bleeding when EGD does not show ulcers or varices.  
2. Recognize clinical/endoscopic clues that point to Dieulafoy lesion versus portal hypertensive or hernia-associated bleeding.


 

The Exam “Test Trick” at Play

The stem deliberately front-loads alcohol use to bait varices/portal hypertensive bleeding, then neutralizes that path by providing a normal esophagus and no varices or gastropathy. The “old blood in the stomach with otherwise normal mucosa” pattern is the exam cue for a hard-to-spot, intermittently bleeding vascular lesion.

Additional Practice Questions and Remediation for Dieulafoy Lesion / Nonvariceal UGIB

Internal Medicine Practice Question 1 — Intermittent hematemesis

A 52-year-old presents with recurrent brisk hematemesis. Initial EGD shows blood in the stomach but no ulcer; repeat EGD during bleeding reveals a protruding vessel in the proximal stomach with minimal mucosal defect. Best diagnosis?

A. Mallory-Weiss tear  
B. Dieulafoy lesion  
C. Gastric adenocarcinoma  
D. Portal hypertensive gastropathy  
E. Cameron lesion  

Answer and Remediation
A — Review: Mallory-Weiss is a mucosal tear at the GE junction after retching; usually linear tear seen.  
B — Correct response!: Large-caliber submucosal artery with tiny mucosal defect; can be missed unless actively bleeding (ACG/ESGE nonvariceal UGIB guidance).  
C — Review: Cancer bleeding is typically oozing from a mass/ulcerated lesion, not a single protruding vessel with normal surrounding mucosa.  
D — Review: Would show characteristic gastric mucosal changes in portal HTN.  

E — Review: Requires hiatal hernia with linear erosions at diaphragmatic pinch.

Internal Medicine Practice Question 2 — Board-style exclusion

A patient with hematemesis undergoes EGD: normal esophagus, no varices, no ulcer, no erosions, but fresh blood pooled in the fundus. Which lesion is most likely if bleeding is intermittent?

A. Esophageal varices  
B. Gastric ulcer  
C. Stress gastritis  
D. Dieulafoy lesion  
E. Gastric antral vascular ectasia  

Answer and Remediation

A — Review: Would be visible varices or stigmata in esophagus/proximal stomach.  
B — Review: Would show an ulcer crater with stigmata.  
C — Review: Typically multiple erosions in critically ill patients.  
D — Correct response!: Classic intermittent arterial source with minimal mucosal abnormality; can present with pooled blood only.  
E — Review: GAVE shows “watermelon stomach” stripes in the antrum and often chronic iron deficiency.

Internal Medicine Practice Question 3 — Hiatal hernia clue

A 68-year-old with chronic iron deficiency anemia has EGD showing a large sliding hiatal hernia and linear erosions at the diaphragmatic impression. Cause?

A. Dieulafoy lesion  
B. Cameron lesion  
C. Portal gastropathy  
D. Esophageal varices  
E. Small bowel angiodysplasia  

Answer and Remediation

A — Review: Dieulafoy is typically abrupt arterial bleeding; not tied to hiatal hernia.  
B — Correct response!: Cameron lesions are linear erosions/ulcers associated with hiatal hernia and chronic blood loss.  
C — Review: Requires portal hypertension and a mosaic gastric pattern.  
D — Review: Would appear as varices; chronic iron deficiency alone is atypical.  
E — Review: Can cause occult bleeding, but the stem gives a specific hiatal hernia-associated lesion.

Internal Medicine Practice Question 4 — Portal HTN pattern recognition

A cirrhotic patient has melena and endoscopy reveals a mosaic “snake-skin” gastric mucosa with diffuse oozing; no active variceal bleeding. Diagnosis?

A. Dieulafoy lesion  
B. Portal hypertensive gastropathy  
C. Cameron lesion  
D. Mallory-Weiss tear  
E. Small intestinal angiodysplasia  

Answer and Remediation

A — Review: Would be focal arterial lesion with minimal defect, not diffuse mosaic oozing.  
B — Correct response!: Classic endoscopic appearance in portal hypertension.  
C — Review: Requires hiatal hernia and linear erosions.  
D — Review: Tear at GE junction after retching.  
E — Review: Not an EGD gastric mucosal finding.

Internal Medicine Practice Question 5 — Next-step reasoning

A patient has ongoing hematemesis. Initial EGD shows large amounts of blood in the stomach but no source identified. After stabilization, what is the most appropriate next diagnostic/therapeutic step to identify a suspected intermittent nonvariceal lesion?

A. Colonoscopy immediately  
B. Repeat endoscopy with careful inspection/therapy (consider during active bleeding)  
C. H. pylori breath test  
D. Empiric anticoagulation for suspected mesenteric ischemia  
E. Capsule endoscopy as first-line  

Answer and Remediation
A — Review: Hematemesis/local gastric blood points to upper source first.  
B — Correct response!: Intermittent lesions (e.g., Dieulafoy) may be missed; repeat EGD during active bleeding improves detection and allows endoscopic hemostasis (ACG 2021; ESGE 2021).  
C — Review: H. pylori evaluation is important for ulcers, but no ulcer seen and patient is actively bleeding.  
D — Review: Not indicated and dangerous in active bleeding.  
E — Review: Capsule is for suspected small bowel bleeding after negative upper/lower evaluation and stabilization; not first-line in active hematemesis.

 

Mini Case Discussion Prompt

How would your differential and next steps change if this same patient had (1) thrombocytopenia and stigmata of cirrhosis, or (2) a large hiatal hernia on EGD, or (3) recurrent melena with negative EGD/colonoscopy?

 

Mini-FAQ

Q1: Why is Dieulafoy lesion “easy to miss” on endoscopy?  
A1: The ABIM-style concept is that the surrounding mucosa can look normal and bleeding is intermittent, so if it’s not actively bleeding, EGD may show only pooled/old blood.

Q2: Does alcohol use make Dieulafoy more likely than varices?  
A2: Alcohol increases the pre-test probability of portal hypertension, but boards expect you to follow the provided endoscopic findings; a normal esophagus with no varices shifts away from variceal bleeding.

Q3: When should you think of portal hypertensive gastropathy instead?  
A3: When there’s portal hypertension plus the characteristic endoscopic “mosaic/snake-skin” gastric pattern with diffuse oozing rather than a focal lesion.

Q4: Where does small bowel angiodysplasia fit on exams?  
A4: It’s classically tested in “obscure GI bleeding” (often occult or melena) after negative EGD/colonoscopy, rather than sudden large-volume hematemesis.


This question appears in Med-Challenger Internal Medicine Review with CME

Try for free and save. Ace your exams and meet your CME/MOC requirements for just $35 a month!

Med‑Challenger Internal Medicine Review (CME)


No matter your program, no matter the size, Med-Challenger for Groups and Institutions can better prepare your program or group, fulfill industry requirements, and increase test scores.

For personal medical education that includes board's prep, MOC, and CME requirements, Med-Challenger has you covered in Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, OBGYNPhysician Assistants, and Nurse Practitioners.

 
Never miss a thing. Subscribe to our blog and save!
 
SUBSCRIBE Medical Education Blog & Newsletter