internal medicine

Most Missed Question in IM Exam Prep – Pulmonary Sequestration

Recurrent pneumonia + systemic aortic feeder on CT suggests pulmonary sequestration. Definitive treatment is surgical resection; embolization is selective.

Subscribe

Subscribe

Recurrent “pneumonia” in a young adult plus a systemic arterial feeder on CT should trigger pulmonary sequestration and definitive surgical resection.

 

Question - Treatment choice

A 26-year-old woman with no previous medical history has experienced 3 episodes of pneumonia in the last year. She has recovered well each time after several courses of oral antibiotics. She is currently hospitalized with her third episode, which was when she presented with fever, cough, and hemoptysis. Her sputum culture shows normal flora. Her HIV testing is negative. Her level of immunoglobulin G (IgG) total and subclasses are within normal limits. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest is shown in the Figure.

Most Missed IM Pulmonary SequestrationFigure.

The lung and mediastinal window show a mass (see Panels A-C). Panel D shows a vessel coming from the abdominal aorta into the mass.

What treatment would you suggest?

Answer Options:  
A. percutaneous embolization
B. prolonged course of antibiotics
C. lobar resection
D. retesting with higher-generation HIV test 

 

Validated correct answer: C. lobar resection. This aligns with contemporary thoracic surgery consensus and standard practice references: pulmonary sequestration (especially symptomatic intralobar sequestration with recurrent infections/hemoptysis) is treated definitively with surgical resection (segmentectomy or lobectomy based on anatomy). Endovascular embolization can be used in select scenarios (e.g., preoperative reduction of blood flow, high surgical risk), but is generally not considered the most definitive therapy due to risks of incomplete occlusion and recurrence/revascularization.

Clinicians miss this because they anchor on “recurrent pneumonia = immunodeficiency” or “treat longer with antibiotics,” but the CT finding of a systemic arterial feeder from the aorta is a board-style “red flag” for sequestration—an anatomic problem requiring an anatomic fix.

 

Why This Question Is Often Missed

- Recurrent pneumonia triggers reflex workup for immunodeficiency while overlooking structural lung disease (sequestration, bronchiectasis, obstruction).

- Test-takers underweight the single most diagnostic clue: arterial supply from the abdominal aorta.

- Confusion about whether embolization is “definitive” rather than adjunctive/selected-case therapy. 

 

What the Distractors Indicate

Option What It Tests / Implies Why It’s Wrong Here
A. percutaneous embolization Knowledge of endovascular approaches to systemic feeders Can be useful adjunct/selected alternative, but **not the most definitive standard** for symptomatic sequestration; recurrence/revascularization can occur.
B. prolonged course of antibiotics Anchoring on infection-only management Treat acute pneumonia as needed, but **recurrent infections** from sequestration require definitive correction; “prolonged” antibiotics do not address the lesion.
C. lobar resection Definitive management of pulmonary sequestration **Correct:** symptomatic sequestration with recurrent infection/hemoptysis → surgical resection (segmentectomy/lobectomy depending on extent).
D. retesting with higher-generation HIV test Overemphasis on occult immunodeficiency HIV and IgG evaluation are reassuring; CT shows **anatomic systemic arterial supply**, which is diagnostic and management-defining.

 

Internal Medicine High-Yield Pearl for Exam Prep

A lung mass with a systemic arterial feeder from the aorta + recurrent pneumonias/hemoptysis = pulmonary sequestration → surgical resection.

 

Core Learning Objectives

1. Identify pulmonary sequestration based on recurrent infections/hemoptysis and CT evidence of systemic arterial supply.

2. Select definitive management for symptomatic pulmonary sequestration (typically surgical resection; embolization reserved for select cases/adjunct).

 

The Exam “Test Trick” at Play

The stem intentionally “clears” immunodeficiency (negative HIV, normal IgG) and then hands you the pathognomonic imaging clue: aberrant systemic arterial supply from the abdominal aorta. Boards reward recognizing when antibiotics are supportive but not definitive—this is a congenital anatomic lesion that requires surgical management.

Additional Practice Questions and Remediation for Pulmonary Sequestration

Internal Medicine Practice Question 1 — Systemic feeder clue

A 30-year-old with recurrent left lower lobe pneumonias has CT angiography showing an anomalous artery from the descending thoracic aorta supplying a posterior basal lung segment that does not communicate with bronchi. Best next step for definitive management?

A. Long-term suppressive azithromycin
B. Surgical resection of the sequestered segment/lobe
C. Repeat HIV RNA testing
D. Inhaled corticosteroid escalation
E. Observation only

Answer and Remediation

A — Review: Antibiotics don’t correct the anatomic lesion causing recurrence.
B — Correct response!: Definitive therapy for symptomatic sequestration is resection (segmentectomy/lobectomy depending on anatomy).
C — Review: Immunodeficiency workup is not the key once systemic arterial supply is demonstrated.
D — Review: Not asthma; doesn’t address systemic arterial sequestration.

E — Review: Observation may be considered in select asymptomatic cases, but recurrent infections favor definitive treatment.

Internal Medicine Practice Question 2 — Differentiate from bronchiectasis

A patient has chronic cough and daily sputum production; HRCT shows diffuse bronchial dilation in multiple lobes without systemic arterial anomaly. Best diagnosis?

A. Pulmonary sequestration
B. Bronchiectasis
C. Pulmonary embolism
D. Sarcoidosis
E. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Answer and Remediation

A — Review: Sequestration is focal dysplastic lung with systemic arterial supply, not diffuse airway dilation.

B — Correct response!: Diffuse bronchial dilation on HRCT is classic for bronchiectasis. C — Review: PE would not cause diffuse bronchial dilation.

D — Review: Sarcoidosis typically shows hilar adenopathy/interstitial patterns.

E — Review: HP shows ground-glass, mosaic attenuation, centrilobular nodules.

Internal Medicine Practice Question 3 — Embolization role

A 45-year-old with confirmed pulmonary sequestration is a poor surgical candidate due to severe cardiopulmonary comorbidity. Which approach is most reasonable?
 
- A. No treatment because it is congenital
- B. Endovascular embolization of the systemic feeding artery
- C. High-dose steroids
- D. Lifelong fluoroquinolone prophylaxis
- E. Bronchial artery embolization (without identifying systemic feeder)

Answer and Remediation

A — Review: Untreated lesions can cause recurrent infection/hemoptysis.

B — Correct response!: In selected high-risk patients, embolization may be used as an alternative/palliative or bridging approach.

C — Review: Not inflammatory lung disease. D — Review: Antibiotic prophylaxis is not a definitive strategy and carries harms.

E — Review: The key vessel is systemic (aortic) supply; bronchial artery embolization alone misses the mechanism.

Internal Medicine Practice Question 4 — Presentation pattern

Which clinical presentation most strongly suggests intralobar sequestration?

- A. Neonatal respiratory distress with mediastinal shift
- B. Recurrent localized pneumonia in a lower lobe with intermittent hemoptysis
- C. Episodic wheeze responsive to albuterol
- D. Upper lobe cavitary disease with night sweats
- E. Exertional dyspnea with normal imaging 

Answer and Remediation

A — Review: More suggestive of large congenital pulmonary airway malformation or diaphragmatic issues.

B — Correct response!: Intralobar sequestration often presents later with recurrent infections/hemoptysis, commonly in lower lobes.

C — Review: Suggests asthma.

D — Review: Suggests TB or fungal disease.

E — Review: Not consistent with sequestration.

Internal Medicine Practice Question 5 — Key imaging discriminator

Which imaging finding is most diagnostic of pulmonary sequestration?

- A. Tree-in-bud opacities
- B. Diffuse ground-glass opacities
- C. Systemic arterial supply from the aorta to nonfunctioning lung tissue
- D. Pleural plaques
- E. Perihilar “bat-wing” edema

Answer and Remediation

A — Review: Small airway infection/bronchiolitis pattern; not specific.

B — Review: Nonspecific (edema, infection, inflammation).

C — Correct response!: Systemic arterial feeder is the defining feature of sequestration.

D — Review: Asbestos-related disease.

E — Review: Cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

 

Mini Case Discussion Prompt

How would your management differ between an asymptomatic incidental sequestration found on imaging versus symptomatic disease with recurrent infections/hemoptysis, and what factors would push you toward embolization versus surgical resection?

 

Mini-FAQ

Q1: What single finding on imaging essentially clinches pulmonary sequestration for boards?
A: A systemic arterial feeder from the aorta; ABIM-style questions use this as the discriminator from other causes of recurrent pneumonia.
 

Q2: Is embolization ever “correct” on exams?
A: It can be, but usually in a non-surgical candidate or as adjunct/preoperative management; the exam-default “definitive” answer for symptomatic sequestration is resection.

Q3: Why doesn’t “prolonged antibiotics” solve the problem?
A: Because the core issue is nonfunctioning lung tissue with abnormal blood supply and poor drainage, predisposing to repeated infection despite adequate short-course therapy.

Q4: What presentations should make you consider congenital lung lesions in adults?
A: Recurrent infections in the same location, hemoptysis, and imaging showing a focal mass/cystic change—especially with atypical vascular anatomy.


This question appears in Med-Challenger Internal Medicine Review with CME

Try for free and save. Ace your exams and meet your CME/MOC requirements for just $35 a month!

Med‑Challenger Internal Medicine Review (CME)


No matter your program, no matter the size, Med-Challenger for Groups and Institutions can better prepare your program or group, fulfill industry requirements, and increase test scores.

For personal medical education that includes board's prep, MOC, and CME requirements, Med-Challenger has you covered in Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, OBGYNPhysician Assistants, and Nurse Practitioners.

 
Never miss a thing. Subscribe to our blog and save!
 
SUBSCRIBE Medical Education Blog & Newsletter

Similar posts

Stay informed.

Subscribe to our Medical Education Blog 

Stay informed of new medical education content, certification requirements and deadlines, case-based CME quizzes, and special offers.